Publication
19 Jul 2016
Area of work:

Traditional general practice is changing. Three quarters of practices are now working collaboratively in larger-scale organisations – albeit with varying degrees of ambition. Policy-makers and practitioners have high hopes for these organisations, and their potential to transform services both within primary care and beyond. But can we be confident that they can live up to these expectations? 

Summary

This research report is drawn from a 15-month study of large-scale general practice organisations in England. The study examined the factors affecting their evolution and their impact on quality, staff and patient experience. It was informed by an extensive literature review, which will be published separately, and combined national surveys with in-depth case studies of contrasting, large-scale general practice organisations and analysis of 15 quality indicators.

Key findings are as follows:

  • This agenda is well underway across the country, with almost three-quarters of general practices already in some form of collaboration with others, almost half of which formed during 2014/15. The major reasons for forming were to ‘achieve efficiencies’ and ‘offer extended services in primary care’. 
  • Larger scale has the potential to sustain general practice through operational efficiency and standardised processes, maximising income, strengthening the workforce and deploying technology. 
  • However, scaling up will take a lot of hard work and cannot just be left to a few heroic leaders. All GPs will need to play a part in making these new organisations successful.
  • The evidence that these organisations can improve quality is mixed. Patients had differing views about the benefits of large-scale organisations. Some appreciated increased access, while others were concerned about losing the close relationship with their trusted GP.
  • The case study organisations had established high-quality specialist services in the community which were popular with patients, but were delivered at relatively small scale. Trust and close engagement between practitioners and commissioners were very important for successful implementation. Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) had to manage the tension between supporting large-scale organisations to develop while also managing conflicts of interest.
  • In light of these findings, the authors argue that policy-makers and practitioners should be realistic in their expectations of the pace at which large-scale organisations can contribute to service transformation. The report offers a series of practical insights and lessons for general practitioners as well as important lessons for policy-makers, national leaders and commissioners.

The full report includes detailed insights about governance, leadership, management or change, staff perceptions and quality improvement methods used in each of our case study sites.

For an overview of findings, please read the research summary.

As part of this research, we also published an literature review of the evidence, which you can download as a seperate report. 

Email to a friend

Your message will be:

I thought you might be interested in this page on The Nuffield Trust website.